Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

---

        In Iran's law, hesitation in the validity of aleatory contract is breaking of the principle of enforceability of definite determination of considerations. With the analysis of the Hadith of Rejection of Risk, a flexible interpretation of civil code (as the documents of principle), and an analysis of the Principle of Unjust Enrichment, the Principle of Security in Action, public order, and the way of wise people (as the basics of principle), it was specified that the mentioned documents and basics are not against the legality of aleatory contract. In Iran, legality of aleatory contract is justifiable with the Theory of Adequacy of Capability Determination of considerations that has been accepted by some Islamic experts. This theory that relays on hardship rule, public order and reasonable custom, is accepted in some cases of Civil Law. In Egypt's Civil Law, considering the acceptance of the Theory of Adequacy of Capability determination, there is no hesitation in the validity of the mentioned contract. The reason for the acceptance of such a theory is the development of the conception of risk in customs. Having no effect of deception in the correction of aleatory contract is another reason for the correctness of the contract under discussion in Egypt's law.       
*Corresponding Author’s E-mail: Rahimi@atu.ac.ir

Keywords: Aleatory contract, risk, Adequacy of capability determination, Deception

Full-Text [PDF 245 kb]   (9045 Downloads)    

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

---