Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

Theorethical Basis For Conceptualizing of Transnational Law

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Author
assistant of law, Tehran university, Qom.Iran
Abstract
Following the emergence of transnational phenomena, societies and norms, these relatively new phenomena organized and articulated by a group of theoreticians under the term of "theory of transnational law". The theory of transnational law as a theory with not a long history has raised many issues. While evaluatting the results of this theory pursuant the presenting the concept of transnational law, one of the most important issues, and perhaps earliest one is to study the theoretical basis which are necessary and help the scholars in describing how to face the normative products of transnational law in existing legal orders.

The theoretical foundations that explain how transnational law is conceptualized can be regarded as the most recent theoretical achievements of law, an attempt to wear the law new camouflage by transnational law.The richest and most powerful of these theoretical foundations can be considered in two schools of legal philosophy- legal positivism and legal sociology. In this paper, while examining the views of these two schools on how to transpose international law into the existing legal order, it has been attempted to determine the status of each in the field of study of transnational law by extracting the distinct aspects and achievements of these two in this regard.
Keywords

Subjects



6-2. انگلیسی
الف) کتاب
10. Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
11. Calliess, Gralf Peter and Peer Zumbansen, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Law-Making, Oxford: Hart, 2010.
12. Cotterrell, Roger, Law’s Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective, Oxford: Clarendon Press,1995.
13. Culver, Keith and Michael Giudice, Legality's Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence, Oxford University Press, 2014.
14. Daniels, Detlef Von, The Concept of Law from a Transnational Perspective, Routledge, 2010.
15. Gaillard, E., Legal Theory of International Arbitration, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.
16. Goldsmith, Jack L., Eric A. Posner, The Limits of International Law, Oxford University Press, 2005.
17. Habermas, Jurgen, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason And The Rationalization of Society, Translated By Thomas Mccarthy, Beacon Press Books, 1984.
18. Habermas, Jurgen, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Lifeworld And System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Beacon Press Books, 1984.
19. Jessup, Philip C., Transnational Law, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1956.
20. Melissaris, Emmanuel, Ubiquitous Law: Legal Theory and the Space For Legal Pluralism, Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2009.
21. Michaels, Ralf., "Territorial Jurisdiction after Territoriality", in J. P. Slot and M. Bulterman (Eds), Strange, Susan, The retreat of the state, The diffusion of power in the world economy, Cambridge Studies In International Relations, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
22. Zumbansen, Peer, Transnational Law, Jan Smits (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.
ب) مقاله
23. Barber, N. W., "Legal Pluralism and the European :union:", European Law Journal, Vol. 12, 2006.
24. Berman, Paul Schiff, "From International Law to Law and Globalization", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 43, 2005.
25. Berman, Paul Schiff, "The New Legal Pluralism", Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 2009.
26. Cotterrell, Roger, "What Is Transnational Law?", Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 37, Is. 2, 2012.
27. Craig, Scott, "Transnational Law As Proto‐Concept: Three Conceptions, Special Issue: Transnationalizing Legal Education", German Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 07, 2009.
28. Del Duca, Louis, "Introduction to Educating Lawyers for Transnational Challenges", Penn State International Law Review, vol. 23, Iss. 4, 2005.
29. Galanter, M., "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change", Law & Society Review, Vol. 9, 1974.
30. Héritier, A. and D. Lehmkuhl, "The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance", Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 28, 2008.
31. Jansen, Nils And Ralf Michaels, "Beyond The State? Rethinking Private Law: Introduction To The Issue", The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 56, 2008.
32. Lobel, O., "The Paradox of Extralegal Activism: Critical Legal Consciousness and Transformative Politics", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 120, 2007.
33. Maccormick, Neil, "Beyond the Sovereign State", The Modern Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 1, 1993.
34. Mahlmann, Matthias,"Theorizing Transnational Law, Varieties of Transnational Law and the Universalistic Stance", German Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 10, 2009.
35. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, "Why and How to Study Transnational Law", UC Irvine Law Review, Vol. 1:1.
36. Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco o., Ramirez, "World Society and the Nation‐State", American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 1997.
37. Michaels, Ralf., "Global Legal Pluralism, Duke Public Law & Legal Theory"; Research Paper No. 259, 2009, Available At: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1430395.
38. Ochoa, C., "The Relationship of Participatory Democracy to Participatory Law Formation", Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 15, 2008.
39. Sweet, A. Stone, "Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Regimes", Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 16, 2009.