Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

The concept and effect of reluctance in civil liability in Iranian and French law

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Hamid Abhary 1
mehrdad pakzad 2
Mohammad Mehdipour 3
1 Professor of Private Law in Mazandaran University, Babolsar, Iran
2 PhD Student in Private Law, Mazandaran University, Babolsar, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Law, Ilam Azad University, Ilam, Iran
Abstract
Man is a voluntary being, and having this quality causes human responsibilities to be borne And if a person is reluctantly influenced by her will, it is not possible to hold her responsible to some extent. Of course, this view is foreseen in the discussion of the general rules of contracts and criminal liability in the laws of Iran and France, but the Iranian legislator has been silent on civil liability law. Scholars of Islamic sciences have addressed this issue in jurisprudential books and disagree on some issues, including the issue of reluctant murder. The Islamic Penal Code legislates the punishment of the reluctant person, but in the legal field, Iranian jurists, in their books on civil liability, briefly refer to the books of jurisprudence and related laws, but a special rule for It has not been predicted. Carefully in the laws of Iran and France, the need to provide separate materials for the issue of reluctance in civil liability of Iran due to the growing importance of civil liability and to prevent disagreement in the judicial process has been felt and the proposed materials have been presented.
Keywords
Reluctance
Civil Liability
Waste
Causation
Iranian and French law

Subjects

1- The Holy Quran.
A) Persian sources:
2- Ardabili, Mohammad Ali, General Criminal Law, Vol. 2, Ch. 28, Tehran, Mizan, 2013.
3- Emami, Seyed Hassan, Civil Law, Vol. 1, Ch. 28, Tehran, Islamic Publications, 2006.
4- Babaei, Iraj, Civil Liability Law and Non-Contractual Obligations, Ch 2, Tehran, Mizan, 2018.
5- Barikloo, Alireza, Civil Liability, Ch 6, Tehran, Mizan, 2015.
6- Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar, Legal Terminology, Ch 14, Tehran, Ganj-e-Danesh, 2004.
7- A group of researchers under the supervision of Hashemi Shahroudi, Seyyed Mahmoud, Farhang-e-Fiqh according to the religion of Ahl al-Bayt (as), vol. 1, ch, 2005.
8- Jordan, Patrice, Principles of Civil Liability, translated and researched by Majid Adib, Ch 4, Tehran, Mizan, 2015.
9- Safaei, Seyed Hassan, Civil Law, General Rules of Contracts, Vol. 2, Ch. 9, Tehran, Mizan, 2010.
10- Safaei, Seyed Hassan, Rahimi, Habibollah, Comparative Civil Liability, Ch 1, Tehran, Shahr-e Danesh, 2018.
11- Shahidi, Mehdi, Formation of Contracts and Obligations, Vol. 1, Ch. 8, Tehran, Majd, 2011.
12- Abdipour, Ebrahim, A Comparative Study of the Concept and Effects of Emergency in Civil Law, Ch 1, Qom, Islamic Propaganda Office, 1997.
13- Amid, Hassan, Farhang Amid, Ch 16, Tehran, Amir Kabir Publications, Tehran, 1978.
14_ Fakhartousi, Javad, in the presence of Sheikh Ansari, vol. 18, ch. 9, Qom, Dar al-Hikma (Allama), 2017.
15- Katozian, Nasser, Civil Law, General Rules of Contracts, Vol. 1, Ch. 8, Tehran, Publishing Company, 2009.
16- Katozian, Nasser, Non-Contractual Obligations, Civil Liability, Vol. 1, Ch. 11, Tehran, University of Tehran, 2012.
17- Mirsaeidi, Seyed Mansour, Criminal Liability, Vol. 1, Ch. 3, Tehran, Mizan, 2011.
18- Nouri- Mohammad Ali, French Civil Law, Ch 1, Tehran, Ganj-e-Danesh, 2001.
19- Yazdanian, Alireza, General Rules of Civil Liability, Vol. 1, Ch. 2, Tehran, Mizan, 2018.
B) Arabic sources:
20- Hosseini Maraghehaei, Seyyed Mir Abdolfattah Ibn Ali, Al-Anawin Al-Fiqhiyyah, vol. 2, ch. 1, Qom, Islamic publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qom, 1997.
21- Khoei, Seyyed Abolghasem Mousavi, Fundamentals of Theology, Volume 2, Number 1, Qom, Institute for the Revival of the Works of Imam Al-Khoei, 2001.
22- Shahid Thani, Zayn al-Din bin Ali Ameli, Al-Rawdha al-Bahiyya fi Sharh al-Lama'ah al-Damashqiyyah, vol. 3, ch. 1, Qom, Davari Bookstore, 1990.
23- Shahid Thani, Zayn al-Din ibn Ali Ameli, Masalak al-Afham to Tanqih Sharia al-Islam, vol. 3, ch. 1, Qom, Institute of Islamic Enlightenment, 1993.
24- Shahid Thani, Zayn al-Din ibn Ali Ameli, Masalak al-Afham to Tanqih Sharia al-Islam, vol. 15, ch. 1, Qom, Institute of Islamic Enlightenment, 1993.
25- Najafi, Sahib Jawaher, Mohammad Hassan, Jawahar al-Kalam fi Sharh Sharia al-Islam, vol. 37, ch. 7, Beirut, Dar Al-Ahya Al-Tarath Al-Arabi, 1984.
26- Najafi, Sahib Jawaher, Mohammad Hassan, Jawahar al-Kalam fi Sharh Sharia al-Islam, vol. 42, ch. 7, Beirut, Dar Al-Ahya Al-Tarath Al-Arabi, 1984.
C) French sources:
27- Ballé (C.),1976, La menace : un langage de violence Paris, CNRS, 1976
28- BAMDE Aurelin & Bourdoisead J, Droit des contrats, Droit des obligations, 2017, https://aurelienbamde.com/2017/02/20/la-violence-notion-elements-constitutifs-et-reforme-des-obligations .
29- Bastide G, (1961), Traité de l’action morale, t. I, n 58, Paris, p 258.
30- C. Goux, (2002), la violence dans la formation des actes juridiques, la théorie générale des obligations, Liège, Formation permanente CUP, vol. 57.,
31- Charlot Ch, (1972), la violation dans les contrats, Mémoire sous la direction du Professeur J. Ghestin, Paris, p49.
32- Cour de cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 19 février 1969.
33-Descamps.(O), 2009, La responsabilité dans le Code civil, Histoire de la justice, n° 19), p 291 - 310
34- F-X. Testu, (2010), Contrats d’affaires, Dalloz, n 12, p34.
35- Mestre (J) et Fage (B), (2006), observations sous 2e Civ, Revue trimestrielle de droit civil, n 1, charonique 3, p 108-109.
36- Partouche (B),2013, Tentative et violences volontaires dans la jurisprudence «contemporaine, Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé », Dalloz, 2013, N° 4, p 759 – 775
37- R.J. Pothier, (1835), Traité des obligations, Tome premier, Bruxelles, Lancet et cie Librairies, n 23.
38- Salomé Zoé, 2014, étude comparative de la notion de violence en droit franco-belge et britannique, mémoire sous direction Philippe Denis, université de catholique de Louvain.