Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

Analyzing the International Performance of States in the Counter-Terrorism Challenge with a Comparative Study of the Three Countries of the United Kingdom, the United States and France

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Abbasali Kadkhodaii 1
Mersedeh Mazloumi 2
1 Professor of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Student of international law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Under normal circumstances, security and freedom as two human rights must be established in every society in order to protect human values ​​and principles; But in the face of terrorism emergencies, governments may be challenged to combine the two human rights of freedom and security. The predominant approach adopted by countries is a security-oriented approach. This paper first examines the laws and judgments of the United Kingdom, France, and the United States, and explains that governments often ignore freedom of expression in these circumstances. In contrast, there is a freedom-oriented approach that in the face of terrorism with the establishment of freedom, security to some extent ignores this approach and this approach due to the desire for a security-oriented approach by governments can not be adopted by governments and only historical aspects of this approach can be adopted. Found by governments. Finally, further investigation in this regard can lead to the conclusion that in balancing security and freedom, moderation can be maintained and, in times of emergency caused by terrorism, restrictive human rights can be restricted as much as possible; In such a way that neither of the two human rights of security and freedom is violated under the pretext of establishing another.
Keywords
Terrorism
Approach
security
freedom
Challenge

Subjects

2- اشرافی، داریوش، «تفسیر جدید از صلح و امنیت بین المللی و تاثیر آن بر حاکمیت ملی»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی، شماره 42 ، 1393، 83-109.
3- حاتمی، مهدی و حاجی زاده، محمود، «بررسی قانون ضدتروریسم انگلستان»، مجله حقوقی نشریه مرکز امور حقوق بین الملل معاونت حقوقی و امور مجلس ریاست جمهوری، شماره 36، 1386، 143-168.
4- خمامی زاده، فرهاد، «مبارزه با پولشویی در بانک ها و موسسات مالی با نگاهی به قانون ضدتروریسم ایالات متحده آمریکا»، مجله حقوقی نشریه دفتر خدمات حقوق بین الملل جمهوری اسلامی ایران، شماره 29، 1382، 5-28.
5-عربستانی، زهرا و موسی زاده، رضا، «مبارزه علیه تروریسم و نقض کنوانسیون اروپایی حقوق بشر توسط کشورهای اروپایی با تاکید بر عملکرد انگلستان و اسپانیا»، فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، شماره 4، 1390، 1087-1112.
6- مجیدی، محمود، «جلوه های ظهور حقوق کیفری امنیت مدار در فرانسه»، فصلنامه حقوقی مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، شماره 2، 1388، 327-344 .
رسائل
1-عالی پور، حسن، «توازن میان امنیت ملی و آزادی های فردی در مقابله جرایم تروریستی»، پایان نامه دکتری، تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، 1387.
- . پیتر –لارنت چتین، جان مک دوئل، سدریک موست، پل انی اسکات، امیل وندر دوز، 1392، پیشگیری از پولشویی و تأمین مالی تروریسم، ترجمه مریم کشتکار، تهران، نشر تاش، ص 31 و 32.
حسینی، سیده لطیفه، 1397، بررسی انتقادی آرای اخیر دادگاه اروپایی دادگستری و دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر درخصوص آزادی مذهب در چارچوب دکترین حاشیه صلاحدید، مجله مطالعات حقوقی دانشگاه شیراز، دوره دهم، شماره دوم، 79-103، ص
1-Franks, Renae Angeroth, "The national security agency and its interference with
private sector. computer security", Lowa law review, 1987, 1039-1015.
Documents
1-UN Doc. S/ Res/ 1267 (1999), 15 October 1999.
2-UN/ Doc. S/ Res/ 1333(2000), 19 December 2000.
3-UN Doc. S/ Res/ 1390 (2002), 16 January 2002.
4--UN Doc. S/Res/ 1456 (2003), 29 January 2003.
5-UN Doc. S/ Res/ 1624 (2005), 14 September 2005.
Awards
1-ECtHR, Irland V. the united kingdom, Judgement, 18 January 1978.
2-ECtHR, A. and others V. the united kingdom, Decision, 19 February 2009.
3- ECtHR, Labsi V. Slovakia, Judgement, 15 May 2012.
4- ECtHR, Ramda V. France, Judgement, 19 December 2017.
1-UNODC, United Nations Office on drugs and crime, 2016, retrieved 21 December 2019 from:
https://www.unodc.org/documents/AnnualReport2016/2016_UNODC_Annual_Report.pdf
Internal Acts
1-Amendment of America 1791
2-National Security decision memorandums (NSDM) of USA 1969-1974
3-Northern Irland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1973
4-Prevention of terrorism (temporary provisions) Act 1974
5-Act No. 1020 of France 9 September 1986 on action against terrorism
6-Constitution of France 1986
7-Anti-terrorism Act of USA 1989
8-French Criminal Code of 1994
Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate, (2021), “special meeting of the counter-terrorism ”,
commemorating the20th anniversary of the adoption of Security Council resolution 1373 (2001) and the establishment of the Counter-Terrorism Committee, retrieved 26 November 2021 from: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ctc/sites/www.un.org.securitycouncil.ctc/files/ctc_special_meeting_4nov2021_conceptnote_final.pdf
Murthy, C.S.R., 2007, the UN counter terrorism committee : an institutional analysis, new York, paper briefing
Park, Yuni, 2017, " U.S.-China counter-terrorism co-operation and its perspective on human rights", p. 5, retrieved 26 November 2021 from:
https://www.iris-france.org/wp-content/
OCC, background investigations, comptroller’s licensing manual, 2002
special meeting of counter-terrorism committee, (2021), “counter-terrorism committee: France wants to deprive terrorists of resources”, retrieved 2 November 2021 from:
https://onu.delegfrance.org/counter-terrorism-committee-france-wants-to-deprive-terrorists-of-resources
European Commission, 2020, communication from the commission, retrieved 26 November 2021 from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0795
DeLaurentis, Ambassador Jeffrey, 2021, "Remarks at a Special Meeting of the Counter-Terrorism Committee Commemorating the 20th Anniversary of the Adoption of Resolution 1373 (2001)", retrieved 26 November 2021 from: https://usun.usmission.gov/remarks-at-a-special-meeting-of-the-counter-terrorism-committee-commemorating-the-20th-anniversary-of-the-adoption-of-resolution-1373-2001/
uropean commission of human rights, the case of Cyprus V. Britain, 1958
EcHR, the case of Ireland V. United Kingdom, 1977
EcHR, Guide on Article 8 of the European convention of human rights, 2021
9-Human rights Act of England 1998
10-Criminal Procedure Code of France 2000
11-Anti-terrorism Act of England 2000
12-Anti-terrorism Act of England 2001
13-USA Patriot Act 2001
14-Act No. 1062 of France 15 November 2001
15-Act No. 239 of France 18 Mach 2003
16-Act No. 204 of France 9 March 2004
17-Anti-terrorism Act of England 2005
18-Anti-terrorism Act of England 2008
19-counter-terrorism and security Act of UK, 12 February 2015.
International Instruments
1-Eropean Convention of human rights
2-The Charter of United Nations
3-Treaty on European :union:
4- The statute of international criminal court
Other resources
1-Keefe, Patrick Radde , "The Worst Of The Worst", THE New Yorker, 2015, 14 September.
2-ODIHR. GAL, the role of civil society in preventing terrorism, report 34/07, 16 May 2007