1- Ph.D student of Public Law, , Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran , m.ghodsi@ut.ac.ir
2- Associate Professor of Public Law, , Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2925 Views)
Corruption arising from abuse of power and its use in the direction of personal interests is a destructive pest of political systems; hence, they have been dealt with in various ways over time. One of the most effective of these is legal solutions to combat the corruption. In this article, the differences and the resemblances of these solutions in the legal systems of Iran and Canada are examined to identify their strengths and weaknesses by comparing them. On the one hand, effective solutions, such as transparency of campaign finance and political participation, and a conflict of interest principle for political agents, specifically applied in Canada, to combat corruption stemming from the power and power relationship in Iran. To be considered by legislators. On the other hand, the strengths of these solutions in Iran, especially in the constitutional law, that proposed legal solutions in this direction, are to be applied effectively.
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:
Comparative Law Received: 2019/07/28 | Accepted: 2020/06/15 | Published: 2020/09/20