Volume 19, Issue 1 (2015)                   CLR 2015, 19(1): 117-142 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gorji1* A A, Mansouri Boroujeni2 M. Comparative Study of the Role of Chairman of the Islamic Consultative Assembly of Iran and Speaker of the House of the Representatives of U.S.. CLR. 2015; 19 (1) :117-142
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-9788-en.html
1- 1- Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2- 2- Ph.D. Student in Public of Law, University of Tehran (Farabi College), Qom, Iran
Abstract:   (7421 Views)
     House of the Representatives in the U.S., as the National Assembly of this state and one of the two pillars of the Congress, is headed by Speaker and, Chairman of the Majlis is the head of the Islamic Consultative Assembly of Iran. Although the constitutional texts and fundamental laws do not provide a special place for these two authorities, however, they have an undeniable role in the structure of government and in the courtyard of their houses. A comparative study of the two shows that parliamentary traditions and historical practices have made a range of qualifications and powers for the Speaker of the House of the Representatives that are hard to see in the Iranian Majlis. The chairman of Majlis has been limited by the internal regulations statute, and it has explicitly resolved these issues. It is should is to be noted that the President of the Majlis, compared to their counterparts in the United States, has a greater administrative powers.     * Corresponding author’s E-mail: gorji110@yahoo.fr
Full-Text [PDF 211 kb]   (1672 Downloads)    

Received: 2014/06/19 | Accepted: 2015/04/11 | Published: 2015/06/21

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.