Volume 25, Issue 3 (2021)
CLR 2021, 25(3): 137-161 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kadkhodaii A, Mazloumi M. Analyzing the International Performance of States in the Counter-Terrorism Challenge with a Comparative Study of the Three Countries of the United Kingdom, the United States and France. CLR 2021; 25 (3) :137-161
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-46742-en.html
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-46742-en.html
1- Professor of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Ph.D. Student of international law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. , mersedehmazloumi@yahoo.com
2- Ph.D. Student of international law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. , mersedehmazloumi@yahoo.com
Abstract: (867 Views)
Under normal circumstances, security and freedom as two human rights must be established in every society in order to protect human values and principles; But in the face of terrorism emergencies, governments may be challenged to combine the two human rights of freedom and security. The predominant approach adopted by countries is a security-oriented approach. This paper first examines the laws and judgments of the United Kingdom, France, and the United States, and explains that governments often ignore freedom of expression in these circumstances. In contrast, there is a freedom-oriented approach that in the face of terrorism with the establishment of freedom, security to some extent ignores this approach and this approach due to the desire for a security-oriented approach by governments can not be adopted by governments and only historical aspects of this approach can be adopted. Found by governments. Finally, further investigation in this regard can lead to the conclusion that in balancing security and freedom, moderation can be maintained and, in times of emergency caused by terrorism, restrictive human rights can be restricted as much as possible; In such a way that neither of the two human rights of security and freedom is violated under the pretext of establishing another.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Comparative Law
Received: 2020/10/10 | Accepted: 2022/01/4 | Published: 2022/04/29
Received: 2020/10/10 | Accepted: 2022/01/4 | Published: 2022/04/29
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |