Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

---

It is a longtime that arbitration has been recognized as an impressive disagreement resolution in the international contracts. However, because of the absolutely technical features of some contracts, for example international construction contract, and also necessity of their issue completion in a determined time, the arbitral institution cannot fulFill what they ask for, especially conventional requests or anticipations. Therefore, after 1957, the international organizations and institutions, active in the domain of international construction contracts, including international federation of consulting engineers (FIDIC): Fédération International Des Ingénieurs Conseils), recommend a number of the typical contracts which, via the pre-arbitral institutions, forecast the resolution of the probable disagreements between master and contractors. These institutions have two notable and leading features: first, the persons who are delegates of disagreement resolution, are essentially engineers or experts on the subject of the argued contract; and second, their will and decisions are indispensable- binding though the possibility of complaint against their decisions exists in arbitral court or courts. In this research, after a brief presentation of pre-arbitral institutions, we proceed to distinguish them form arbitral institutions and finally, we consider and analyzed the effects of pre-arbitral involving stipulations on the both parties' right to call on the arbitration.

Keywords: Pre-Arbitral, Arbitral Institution, Consulting Engineer, Interna tional Federation of Consulting Engineers, Dispute Adjudication Borad, Pre-Arbitral Referee

Full-Text [PDF 201 kb]   (3091 Downloads)    

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

---