Volume 24, Issue 4 (2020)                   CLR 2020, 24(4): 145-167 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Ph.D. Student in Private Law, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Professor of Private Law, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , abkarimi@ut.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2642 Views)
One of the important issues to be taken into account in investment agreements is to define the applicable law or resourcesgoverning the agreement. Upon defining the applicable law, based on the mutual agreement or through applying conflict resolution rules, it is possible for the parties to define the place of reference, interpretation, analysis, and inference of various topics. In the international agreements, such mutual agreements are binding and shall be applied by the
investigating authorityin analyzing and eventually granting the reward as for the disputes raisedout of the agreement. However, in the international commercial agreements, in particular, the investment cases, the arbitration authorities are hardly inclined to have exclusive use of the law or the defined resources. Actually, they commonly have direct or indirect useof other resources (non-defined resources)in different ways. The main subject of this article is the limits of arbitration authorities in referring the cases, using non-defined resources and the impact rate of such resources on the outcome of the agreement.
Full-Text [PDF 966 kb]   (842 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Comparative Law
Received: 2019/12/15 | Accepted: 2021/02/16 | Published: 2021/03/10

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.