Volume 15, Issue 3 (2011)
CLR 2011, 15(3): 133-152 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Madanian1 G, Rahmatollahi2 H, Khaleghi Damghani3 A. The Rights of Access or Refusal to Clarify the Concept of Public Order (The Rights of Iran, Britain and France). CLR 2011; 15 (3) :133-152
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-10604-en.html
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-10604-en.html
1- 1- Ph.D. Student of Public Law, University of Tehran (Qom Branch), Qom, Iran
2- 2- Assistant Professor of Public Law, University of Tehran (Qom Branch), Qom, Iran
3- 3- Assistant Professor of Political Sciences, University of Tehran (Qom Branch), Qom, Iran
2- 2- Assistant Professor of Public Law, University of Tehran (Qom Branch), Qom, Iran
3- 3- Assistant Professor of Political Sciences, University of Tehran (Qom Branch), Qom, Iran
Abstract: (7796 Views)
There has long been no compromise between the experts about an important subject such as public regularity. In spite of the high importance of public regularity concept in ordering the legal system and also confining legitimate rights of citizens and exposure of legal return, according to contravention, passing or deviation from it. Hence, two different proponents and opponents have tried to prove their own beliefs against each other according to applying reasons and each of them has offered some logics about their own rightfulness. The authors regarding the parties’ reasons, necessary pillars and criteria about this idea believe that, since in all topics related to public regularity, the target is to avoid doing any task, there identifying and defining the concept of public order is an important issue which cannot be overlooked easily. Authors defend a doctrine with different reasons that needs and necessitates presenting a definite description. It is also emphasized to explain this concept and remove the existing challenges need endeavor of legislators and lawyers in illustrating profits and social benefits as an undeniable subject.
Received: 2011/11/19 | Accepted: 2011/12/21 | Published: 2012/09/1
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |