Volume 15, Issue 3 (2011)
CLR 2011, 15(3): 1-20 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abhary1 H, Miri2 H. Comparative Study of the Liability Bases of the Internet Services Providers. CLR 2011; 15 (3) :1-20
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-10938-en.html
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-10938-en.html
1- 1- Associate Professor, Department of Private Law Mazandaran University, Mazandaran, Iran
2- 2- Ph.D. Student of private Law Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2- 2- Ph.D. Student of private Law Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (6241 Views)
The Internet Services Providers (ISPs) have liability for the injurious acts of themselves and their subscribers. Determining the bases of their responsibility is the most important subject about them. In this regard in the foreign law, someone believes that the fault is the base, and others believe in strict liability. Thus enacting rules such as Electronic Commerce Directive and DMCA were upset to appear a new system applying on liability, i.e. non-liability regime. Thon, under some circumstances the Internet, service providers, known as intermediates, would have no liability for other contents and activities. Generally speaking, in the current legal system of Iran, there are no certain rules about it, and according to the Civil Liability Act, liability is based on negligence. In this field, however, the presumption of negligence may be useful.
* Corresponding Author’s E-mail: hamid.abhary@gmail.com
* Corresponding Author’s E-mail: hamid.abhary@gmail.com
Received: 2010/01/23 | Accepted: 2011/12/3 | Published: 2012/08/26
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |