Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

---

        The legal system governing the administration of elections as a mechanism has been mentioned at the constitutions, statute law and the fundamental customs of the different countries managing accurate and fair election. The significance and rule of the election administration system holding an advised election, has a direct ratio with healthy, clarity and accuracy of the election progress. In the practical praxis of countries, the independent, governmental and mixed models have been formally recognized; as countries following this model can be classified from this viewpoint. In fact, according to the given models, the basic purpose of making electoral institutions is the maximum guaranty of the protection of citizens' votes, and finally, performing a fair election. Although, based on some indicators, the executive management can be divided into several models, it is not possible to decisively assert that the process of implementation of the election in some countries with similar model hold equally; in other words, the model type of the institution of election administration cannot conclusively indicate the implementation of similar process of election of countries. This article tries to legally examine the Triple Systems Executive Management (TSEM) of election in the world and mentioning the Principles of ruling the activity of election institutions. Finally, some propositions regarding the administration of elections in Iran are offered.       * Corresponding author’s E-mail: danyal.mashhud@gmail.com

Keywords: Election, Administrative institution of election, Governmental model, Independent model, Mixed model

Full-Text [PDF 212 kb]   (6590 Downloads)    

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

---