Volume 17, Issue 3 (2013)
CLR 2013, 17(3): 69-90 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Savari *, H, Purhasan S. Contrasting Mechanisms of Prevention of Organized Crimes and Human Right Norms. CLR 2013; 17 (3) :69-90
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-9831-en.html
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-9831-en.html
1- 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , savari@modares.ac.ir
2- 2. Ph.D. Student, Department of Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2- 2. Ph.D. Student, Department of Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (8002 Views)
Today, the majority of states try to justify their sever action-reaction against organized crimes even in preventing of commission of these crimes, alleging that such crimes would threaten the public order and national security. The question may arise is whether prevention of such crimes at any cost is justified? Accepting the great danger of organized crimes in the international community, it is worth to note that there are some fundamental rules to protect the human rights and dignity of mankind known as jus cogens, and strict their powers and margin of action in resorting to violent methods for fighting against organized crimes.
Subject:
Comparative Law
Received: 2013/10/26 | Accepted: 2013/12/21 | Published: 2013/12/21
Received: 2013/10/26 | Accepted: 2013/12/21 | Published: 2013/12/21
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |