1
1-Ph.D. student, Department of Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2
2- Ph.D. student, Department of Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
One of the frequent matters in Iranian industrial property law is the problem of provisional order. Nevertheless, some of the phrases applied in the regulation confuse judges in taking injunctional measures. For example, when the seizure of violating goods is for the purpose of provisional order, or which court has the local competent when the subject matter of the order is situated out of Tehran jurisdiction? This article seeks to answer the questions arisen from vague points of the matter in Iranian law in order to release judges from the confusion and give suggestions for next reformation of the law.
Daryae,R. D. and Norouzi,M. (2012). Comparative Research on Interim Injunction in Iranian Industrial Property Law and TIRIPS agreement. Comparative Law Researches, 16(1), 79-105.
MLA
Daryae,R. D. , and Norouzi,M. . "Comparative Research on Interim Injunction in Iranian Industrial Property Law and TIRIPS agreement", Comparative Law Researches, 16, 1, 2012, 79-105.
HARVARD
Daryae R. D., Norouzi M. (2012). 'Comparative Research on Interim Injunction in Iranian Industrial Property Law and TIRIPS agreement', Comparative Law Researches, 16(1), pp. 79-105.
CHICAGO
R. D. Daryae and M. Norouzi, "Comparative Research on Interim Injunction in Iranian Industrial Property Law and TIRIPS agreement," Comparative Law Researches, 16 1 (2012): 79-105,
VANCOUVER
Daryae R. D., Norouzi M. Comparative Research on Interim Injunction in Iranian Industrial Property Law and TIRIPS agreement. Comparative Law Researches, 2012; 16(1): 79-105.
