Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

A Comparative Analysis of the Effect Third Party Fraud to the Payment of Transaction Documents

Authors
Morteza Shahbazinia
Zahra Ayoubi
Abstract
One of the basic characteristics of documentary transactions is the independence of these transactions from the underlying contract and the documentary payment terms in these transactions. The beneficiary of the letter of credit shall present the documents stated in the Letter of Credit or the bank guarantee in order to claim payment. In some cases, the documents presented by the beneficiary are fraudulent while this action might have been committed without cooperation or even the information of the beneficiary by a third party. Whether or not the principle of fraud would be applicable regarding the third party fraudulent actions, two viewpoints have been presented. Many lawyers believe in the view that the fraud principle is also applicable for the third party deceptions, and the payment shall be withheld (it shall be refrained from payment) in this regard. On the other hand, another group believes that the fraud principle is not applicable against the guiltless beneficiary, and the amount in the letter of credit shall be paid. This article will review and analyze the position of legal systems in this respect.
Keywords
Documentary Transactions
Documentary Credit
Bank Guarantee
Principle of strict compliance
Third Party Fraud
[1]    Xiang. G, The Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Credit: A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 2002.
[2]     گائو ایکس یانگ و روس بوکلی، «مطالعه تطبیقی در مورد قاعده تقلب و معیار آن در حقوق اعتبار اسنادی»، ترجمه ماشالله بنانیاسری، مجله حقوقی، ش36، 1386.  
[3]    Ericsson. H, “Securing Export Payment – Particularly with Focus on China”, Master’s thesis, Jönköping International Business School Jönköping University, 2005.  
[4]    Gutteridge. H. C. and Megrah. M, The Law of Bankers' Commercial Credits, 7th ed,London: Europa Publications Limited, 1984.
[5]    Civil Judgment of the Higher Court of Jiangsu Province of PRC, Tribunal No. 3, Final Judgment, No. 52 , 2003. http://www. lawinfochina. com /display. aspx?lib=case&id=368#
[6]    Harfield. H, Bank Credits and Acceptances, 5th ed, New York: Ronald, 1974.
[7]    Zhang. Y, Approaches to Resolving the International Documentary Letters of Credit Fraud Issue, Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies No 15, 2011.   
[8]    Zhang. Y, “Evaluation of documentary letter of credit fraud exception rules in China”,Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 2014.
[9]     Mallaya. S, “Documentary Credit Law”, PhD dissertation, School of Legal Studies Cochin University of Science and Technology, 2007.
[10] Debattista. C, “Performance Bonds and Letters of Credit: a Cracked Mirror Image,” Journal of Business Law, JUL, 289-305, 1997.
[11] Gillies. P & Moens. G; International Trade and Business Law, Policy and Ethics, Australia: by Cavendish Publishing Pty Limited, 2006.
[12] Browne. J, “The fraud exception to standby letters of credit in Australia: Does it embrace statutory unconscinability?” vol. 11, Bond Law Review98, 1999.
[13] Tóth. Z, “Documentary Credits in International Commercial Transactions with Special Focus on the Fraud Rule”,PÁzmÁny PÉter Catholic University Doctoral Degree Program of the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Athens/Budapest, 2006.
[14] Smith. G. W, “Irrevocable Letters of Credit and Third Party Fraud: The American Accord”, 24 Virginia Journal of International Law 55, 1983.
[15] Davis. A. G, The Law Relating to Commercial Letters of Credit, London: Wiley, Vol. 28, No. 2, Mar 1965.
[16] Ellinger.  E. P, “Fraud in Documentary Credit Transactions”, J. B. L. 258, 1981.
[17] Mark. W, “Documentary Credits and Fraud: English and Chinese Law Compared”,J. B. L. , Mar, 155-170, 2004.
[18] Longwa Kayembe. G, “The Fraud Exception in bank Guarantees”, Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town, 2008.
[19] Bertrams. R, Bank Guarantees in international trade, 3rd ed, Kluwer law international, 2004.
[20] Jack. R, et al Documentary Credits, 4rd , Tottel Publishing, 2009.
[21] Turner, P S. “Notices of Discrepancy and Requests for Waiver under UCP 500 - What's the Problem?” In DC Insight Vol. 10, No. 3, 2004.
[22] Lazar. S, Letters of Credit: the law and Current Practice, Toronto: Carswell Legal Publications, 1989.
[23]  نهاوندیان، محمد، یادداشتی بر مقررات متحدالشکل اعتبارات اسنادی (یو. سی. پی600)، انتشارات کمیته بازرگانی بین‌المللی، 1373.
[24]   کاتوزیان، ناصر، اثبات و دلیل اثبات، ج1، تهران، میزان، 1380.
[25]   حیاتی، علی عباس، آیین دادرسی مدنی در نظم حقوق کنونی، چ2، تهران، میزان، 1390.