Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

Analysis of bases, concept and output of succession structure in contracts in Iran and France law

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
asem mohamadi 1
seyed hekmatollah askari 2
1 department of law, islamic azad university.mamasani,iran
2 Assistant Professor of law group, faculty of humanity and law, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz branch, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Abstract Succession structure in contracts law in France legal system is according to element of commitments individuality, element of contracts promissory and also existence of asset structure, with definition and output of that legal system. Despite all Iran civil law authors, succession structure in contracts with the output that it has in France law, have accepted in Iran law. But seem that concepts and elements which cause presentation and planning of this structure in France law, in Iran legal system Emamieh Fighh, doesn’t exist as its main origin, and succession structure in contracts law in Iran legal system with following of Emamieh Fighh, have different meaning and output to France law. In Islamic Fighh only heirs called substitute and the output of this legal structure in contracts law, is just survival of contract and lack of possibility of disbanding and annulment of that by heirs, after death of testator (contract party), and the cause is the principles of bindingness.
Keywords
Succession
Contract
Obligation
Asset

Subjects


8-3. فرانسوی
Aubry et Rau,. Cours de Droit Civil Francais. T. 1,Par Et.re Ponsard, 7 ed. Paris 1994: T. IV, 6 ed. Par Bartin, 1992: T. VI, Par Esmein, 1993: T. XI,6, ed.
Bénabent(Alain). Droit civil. Les obligations. 5 éd.Montchrstien.1995.
Beudant, Che, Cours de Droit civil francias, t. VIII. Les contrasts et les obligations, 2éd., Par .
Cabrillac, Remy, Droit des obligations. 7 éd. Dalloz. 2006.
Colin et Capitan. Cours él é mentire de Dorit Civil Francais.10 é d. Par Leon jullliot de la Morandiere. Dalloz 1948, t.II. T.4.1953
Decottignies, R., Ayant Cause, Répertoire de droit civil, 2 éme éd, Dalloz, Paris, 1975.
Demogue, Rene,. Traite des obligations en general T.I,II, VII,Paris, 1992 et sui.
Gaudmet, Eugéne, Théorie générale des obligations. P.152. 1é, dé Dalloz. 2004.
Grimaldi , M , Successions, 5éd, litec, Paris 1988.
Jane. Philip.et Andro.kastadlo. Histoire des obligations. Paris.2002.
Malinvaud, P, Droit des obligations, Lexis Nexis, Litec. 2005.
Mazeaud(H., J.) et CHabas (F.), lesons de Droit civil, t. 2, premier volume, obligation, 9 èd., Par chabas, 1998.
Mlaurie, Ph., et Aynes, L., Les obligations , 10 éme éd, Cujas, Paris,2000.
Plissier, Les obligations alimantaires, unite ou diversité, t. XXVIII, 1961.
Savaux. E, Subrogations Personnelle, Encyclopédie, Réperatoire de Droit civil, t. X,2002.
Starck. Borise. Dorit civil. Les obligation. Paris.1972.
Toulet, Valerie. Droit Civil. Les obligations. 1 éd. Paradigme. 2005.
Voirin, P ., Droit civil, T . 1 , Par Goubeaux ,.22 éme éd, L. G.D.J, Paris.1989.
Weill, Alex,. Droit Civil,Les obligation.
Precis Dalloz,paris,1991.