مطالعه تطبیقی تعیین قانون حاکم بر معاملات با حق وثیقه در اموال فکری

1- Clive M. schmitthoff . The English Conflict of Laws- Stevens, Edition3 , 1954
2- F.J. Alferez, The Rome I Regulation: Much Ado About Nothing2 European Legal Forum , 2008.
3- Grant Gilmore, The Secured Transactions Article of the Commercial Code, 16 Law and Contemporary Problems 27-48 (Winter 1951).
4- Gungor, The Principle of Proximity in Contractual Obligations: The New Turkish Law on Private Inter-national Law and International Civil Procedure, 2008.
5- J. Hill, the Law Relating to International Commercial Disputes (2nd edition, Lloyds of London Press, London, 1998).
6- Jan Hendrik, Daihuisen on International Commercial. Financial and Trade Law (Oxford, Portland/Oregon 2000).
7- James J. White, Choice-of-Law in Secured Transactions, http://web4.uwindsor.ca/units/law/CARC/main.nsf/0/e096c2495caf982b852570fb00737f6a/$FILE/White.pdf
8- Lindberg. A., Jurisdiction on the Internet—The European Perspective: An Analysis of Conventions, Statutes and Case Law, American Bar Association, 20 July 1997, <http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/cyber/initiatives/eujuris.html>.
9- M. Bogdan, Contracts in Cyberspace and the Regulation ‘Rome I’,2009.
10- Mario Giuliano and Paul Lagarde , Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, [1980] OJ C282/1 (the Giuliano and Lagarde Report).
11- Marshall, Brooke Adele, «Reconsidering The Proper Law of The Contract», Melbourne Journal of International Law, 2012.
12- P. Mankowski, The Principle of Charac-teristic Performance Revisited Yet Again in Convergence and Divergence in Private International Law, Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr (Schultess and Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2010).
13- P Rummel (ed), Kommentar zum allgemeinen buergerlichen Gesetzbuch Band II, Teil 6, para 4 (Manz,2004) (with references to relevant case law).
14- P.R. Williams, The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations, 1986.
15- Ralf Michaels, Post-Critical Private International Law: From Politics to Technique, (Horatia Muir Watt & Diego P. Fernández Arroyo eds.), 2014.
16- Rühl, Giesela, (2007), «Party Autonomy in the Private International Law of Contracts: Transatlantic Convergence and Eeconomic Efficiency», Law Research Institute Research Paper Series, CLPE Research Paper 4/2007, Vol. 03 No. 01. P.4.
17- Shuhong, Y.; Yongping, X.; Baoshi, W, The closest connection doctrine in the conflict of laws in china,Chinese journal of international law, 8(2, 2009.
18- Tang, Zheng, «Law Applicable in the Absence of Choice - The New Article 4 of the Rome I Regulation, Legislation and Reports», The Author. Journal compilation, The Modern Law Review Limited , (2008).
19- American Law Institute, Intellectual Property. Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Judgments in Transnational Disputes (St Paul,MN, American Law Institute Publishers, 2008).Available on the website http://www.cl-ip.eu/.
20- CLIP, Principles for Conflicts of Laws in Intellectual Property (Oxford University Press, 2012), available at www.cl-ip.eu.
21- Regulation 593/2008 (Rome I), on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations.
22- Regulation (EC) 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II), [2007] OJ L199.