Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

bank deposit insurance (comparative study in American and Iranian law)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Phd Student of Islamic jurisprudence and Private law Shahid Motahhari University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The United States has been pioneering in the field of bank deposit insurance, and the deposit insurance was formally established in 1933 by the “federal deposit insurance corporation”, but in Iranian law, the deposit insurance system was established by the adoption of Article 95 of the fifth development plan act adopted in 2010, and the deposit guarantee fund was established in 2013. Due to the difference in the history of American and Iranian law, the deposit insurance system, although have similarities, but their differences are greater. In fact, the Federal Deposit Insurance Company(FDIC), in addition to being a deposit insurer, is one of the main supervisors of the US banking system, and thus, with its consistent supervision, will prevent the deterioration of the financial condition of the banks. Also, if (FDIC) sees the bank's situation unsatisfactory, it has the power to appoint itself as the bank's receiver and to prevent exacerbation of the bank's inappropriate condition, but in Iranian law, the duty of deposit guarantee fund will start when a bank goes bankrupt. The present study attempts to examine the deposit insurance institution in the US and Iran with a comparative approach, and ultimately offers suggestions to strengthen the institution in Iranian law.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] امیری، حسین، توفیقی، مونا، الزامات وجود بیمه سپرده و ارتباط آن با مقاومت بانکی، فصلنامه اقتصاد مالی، سال یازدهم، شماره 41، زمستان 1396.
[2] باقری، محمود، عبدی، صادق، برخی، نسیم، ابعاد حقوقی نقش و قابلیت بیمه سپرده در ایران، دوفصلنامه دانش حقوق مدنی، سال هفتم، شماره اول، بهار و تابستان 1397، پیاپی 13.
[3] ستوده تهرانی، حسن، حقوق تجارت، جلد چهارم، تهران، انتشارات دادگستر، چاپ 18، 1391.
[4] طباطبایی نژاد، سید محمد، کاستی‌های نظام ورشکستگی بانک‌ها در ایران»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، شماره 1، 1394.
[5] عیسائی تفرشی، محمد، مباحثی تحلیلی از حقوق شرکت‌های تجاری، ج 1، چ 3، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 1396.
[6] Ambrasase, Tomas, Bank resolution regime. Balancing private and public interests. A comparative analysis, Doctoral Dissertation Social Sciences, Law (01 S), Vilnius, Basel, 2015.
[7] Bliss, Robert R., Georg G. Kaufman, A comparison of U.S. corporate and bank insolvency resolution, 20/2006, Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve bank of Chicago.
[8] Bovenzi, John F., Inside in the FDIC, Thirty years of Bank, Failures, Bailouts, and Regulatory Battles, Published by John Willy & Sons, New jersey, 2015.
[9] Flannery, Mark J., Using market information in prudential bank supervision: a review of the U.S. empirical evidence, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30, 1998.
[10] Getter, Getter, E., Federal Deposit Insurance for Banks and Credit ::::union::::s, Congressional Research Service. R41718, 2014.
[11] Kane, Edward J., and Robert H. Hendershott, "The Federal Deposit Insurance Fund that Didn't Put a Bite on U.S. Taxpayers," Journal of Banking and Finance 20 September, 1996.
[12] Kunt, Asli Demirguc-, Edward Kane, Deposit Insurance Around the Global: Where Does it Work? The World Bank and Boston College, 2001.
[13] Legislative Council Secretariat, Financial System of the United States of America, Research and library services division, prepared by: Vicky Lee, IN10/00-01, 2001.
[14] Scott, Kenneth E., The Dual Banking System: A Model of Competition in Regulation, 30 Stan. L. Rev. 1, 41 (1977).
[15] Sicilia, David B., Jeffrey L. Cruikshank, The Greenspan Effect, New York: McGraw-Hill, (2000).
[16] Spong, Kenneth, Banking Regulation: It's Purposes, Implementation and Effects, Division of Supervision and Risk Management Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City 2000.
[17] Zhang, Jihong, (2016), A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APPLICATION OF BANK INSOLVENCY, Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 33, No. 1.