Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

Conditions and Causes for Obligation to Mitigate Damages and the Effect of Negligence in It under Iranian and German Law

Document Type : Analytic Review

Authors
1 Assistant Professor in Private law, Faculty of Human Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran
2 Associate Professor in Private law, Faculty of Human Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran
Abstract
In case of breaching the contract, the injured party is entitled to receiving the compensation that places him in a status similar to full performance situation. However, if the injured party has a role to increasing the damage, either by failing to take reasonable action to mitigate the loss or by acting in a way that aggravates it, the principle of full compensation will be defected and the Amount of compensation will be regulated based on this role. This article, titled "Conditions and Causes for Obligation to Mitigate Damages and the Effect of Negligence in It under Iranian and German Law," Addresses this question that how is the scope and conditions of the injured party's obligation to mitigate and how to claim the relevant costs. Using a descriptive-analytical method and library resources, the research findings show the obligation to mitigating the damage is limited to reasonable and acceptable measures, and also substitute contract formation with a third party could fall within this framework. Moreover, the incurred costs to mitigate damages are receivable, and injured party's negligence is considered as one of the main basis to mitigate the amount of compensation.
Keywords

Subjects


منابع فارسی
1. ابهری، حمید، کاویار، حسین ( 1392) نظریه تقلیل خسارت در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی کالا(1980 وین) و حقوق ایران، شماره 2 ، مجله دانش حقوق مدنی
2. بادینی، حسن ( 1394) فلسفه مسئولیت مدنی، چاپ سوم، تهران، شرکت سهامی انتشار
3. حاضری، جواد (1385) قاعده کاهش خسارت در کامن لا و کنوانسیون بیع 1980، شماره شش و هفت، مجله گواه
4. زندی، محمدرضا ( 1391) رویه قضایی دادگاههای بدوی و تجدیدنظر استان تهران، چاپ دهم، تهران، انتشارات جنگل
5. سادات اخوی، محسن، کاشانی، محمود( 1380) تکلیف زیان دیده به کاستن از خسارت، شماره سی و سوم، مجله علوم اجتماعی و انسانی دانشگاه شیراز
6. شعاریان، ابراهیم ، مولایی، یوسف ( 1391) مطالعه تطبیقی مبانی قاعده ی تقلیل خسارت، سال اول، شماره دوم، نشریه فقه و حقوق اسلامی
7. صادقی، محسن ( 1383) شیوه های جبران خسارت ناشی از نقض تعهد قراردادی در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی کالا، شماره پنجم، مجله پژوهش حقوقی
منابع خارجی
1. Barnett.k(2016) Substitutive Damages and Mitigation in Contract Law, Singapore Academy of Law Journal
2. Cooter, R. D. (1989). The Best Right Laws: Value Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law, Notre Dame Law Review
3. Knapp, V. (1998). Article 77, Commentary on the International Sales Law: The 1980 Vienna Sales Convention-edited by C Massimo Bianca and Michael Joachim Bonell, Giuffre
4. Saidov, D. (2008). The Law of Damages in International Sales: The CISG and other International Instruments, Hart Publishing
5. Schlechtriem, P. & Butler, P. (2009). UN Law on International Sales: The UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Springer-Verlag
6. Ridder, P., & Weller, M. P. (2014). Unforeseen circumstances, hardship, impossibility and force majeure under German contract law. Eur. Rev. Private L
7. Rigaudeau, Baptiste. (2010), The Calculation of Damages in Arbitration: towards more Flexibility in Assessing Mitigation?, Versailles International Arbitration and Business Law Review
8. Rizink, P. (2009). Article 77 CISG: Reasonableness of the Measures Undertaken to Mitigate the Loss, Thesis for M.A. Degree
9. Peel, E. (2011). Treitel on the Law of Contract, Sweet and Maxwell
10. Lookofsky, J. (2008). Understanding the CISG, A Compact Guide to the 1980 United Nations Convention on contract for the International Sale of Goods, Kluwer Law International
11. Zimmerman, R. (2005). The New German Law of Obligations: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford Scholarship Online