Adviescollege toetsing regeldruk (2020) Rapportage n.a.v. het ATR-onderzoek naar het IAK(-
document) bij voorgenomen wet- en regelgeving [Report following the ATR survey on the IAK
(document) in proposed legislation and regulation]. The Hague, December 2020.
Advice of the ICT Review Office (2017) Annex to Parliamentary papers II, 2017/18, 33118, no. 98.
Alemanno A (2011) A Meeting of Minds on Impact Assessment. European Public Law 17(3):485–
505.
Biasiotti M, Francesconi E, Palmirani M, Sartor G, Vitali F (2008) Legal Informatics and
Management of Legislative Documents. Global Centre for ICT in Parliament Working Paper
No. 2.
Bovens M, Zouridis S (2002) From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information
and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional
Control. Public Administration Review (62)2:174–184.
Bucher T (2018) If…Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Busch C, De Franceschi A (2018) Granular Legal Norms: Big Data and the Personalization of
Private Law. In: Mak V, Tjong Tjin Tai E, Berlee A (eds) Research Handbook on Data Science
and Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Gloucestershire, pp. 408–424.
Citron D (2008) Technological due process. Washington University Law Review 85(6):1249–1313.
Cohen J (2016) The Regulatory State in the Information Age. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17(2):1–
32.
De Filippi P, Hassan S (2016) Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: From code is law
to law is code. First Monday 21(12).
Devins C, Felin T, Kauffman S (eds) (2017) The Law and Big Data. Cornell Journal of Law and
Public Policy 27(2):357–413.
Drahmann A, Huijts JHM (2021) Het Digitaal Stelsel Omgevingswet: ICT-flop of belofte voor
de toekomst? [The Digital System Environment and Planning Act: ICT flop or promise for the
future?]. Computerrecht 2021(3): 241–249.
Fagan F, Levmore S (2019) The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Rules, Standards, and Judicial
Discretion. Southern California Law Review 93(1):1–35.
Fuller L (1969) The Morality of Law, rev. edn. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Hacker P (2018) The ambivalence of algorithms. In: Bakhoum M, Conde Callego B, Mackenrodt M
(eds) Person Data in Competition. Consumer Protection and Intellectual Property Law. Springer,
Berlin, pp. 85–117.
Hildebrandt M, Koops B-J (2010) The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the
Profiling Era. Modern Law Review 73(3):428–460.
Ingrams A (2020) A machine learning approach to open public comments for policymaking.
Information Polity 25(4):433–448.
Kelso R (1994) Considerations of Legislative Fit Under Equal Protection, Substantive Due Process,
and Free Speech Doctrine: Separating Questions of Advancement, Relationship and Burden.
University of Richmond Law Review 28(5):1279–1310.
Kugler M, Strahilevitz L (2019) Assessing the Empirical Upside of Personalized Criminal
Procedure. University of Chicago Law Review 86:489–525.
Lessig L (1999) Code and other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books, New York.
Lokin M (2018) Wendbaar wetgeven. De wetgever als systeembeheerder [Agile Legislation, the
legislator as system administrator]. Boom Juridisch, The Hague.
Lokin M (2020) Agile Law Making. In: Dietz J, Mulder H (eds) Enterprise Ontology. A HumanCentric Approach to Understanding the Essence of Organisation. Springer, Berlin, pp. 416–417.
Mastenbroek E, Van Voorst S, Meuwese A (2016) Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta evaluation of
ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy,
23(9):1329–1348.
Noveck B-S (2018) Crowdlaw: Collective intelligence and lawmaking. Analyse & Kritik 40(2):359–
380.
22 AI and Lawmaking: An Overview 449
Passchier R (2021) Artificiële intelligentie en de rechtsstaat. Boom Juridisch, The Hague.
Perritt H (1992) The Electronic Agency and the Traditional Paradigms of Administrative Law.
Administrative Law Review 44:96–98.
Solivan J, Farina C (2013) Regulation Room: How the Internet Improves Public Participation
in Rulemaking. Cornell e-Rulemaking Initiative Publications 13, https://scholarship.law.cornell.
edu/ceri/13.
Stivers C (1994) The Listening Bureaucrat: Responsiveness in Public Administration. Public
Administration Review 54(4):364–369.
Sunstein S (1995) Problems with Rules. California Law Review 953(83):956–1021.
Toews R (2019) AI Will Transform the Field of Law. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/
Van den Berge L (eds) (2020) Maatwerk in het bestuursrecht. Boom Juridisch, The Hague.
Van Maanen G (2021) Open ground water data in Noord-Brabant: a philosophical ethnography of
open data policy. Presentation at conference ’Knowledge, Citizenship, Democracy’. Groningen
University 14-16 April 2021. https://www.rug.nl/staff/l.m.herzog/program_abstracts_digital.pdf.
Wolswinkel C, Meuwese A, Boonstra N (2021) Measuring ‘customization’ in legislation: lessons
learnt from a cross-departmental exercise, forthcoming.
Yamane N (2020) Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Field and the Indispensable Human Element
Legal Ethics Demands. The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 33:877–890. https://www.geo
rgetown.edu/