Comparative Law Researches

Comparative Law Researches

Criminal Law Theory in Republican Thought

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Associate Professor in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran
10.48311/clr.2025.116807.82778
Abstract
The type of attitude towards the fundamental concepts affecting different areas of criminal law, such as the scope of criminal law, the necessity and justification of criminal law, the principles of criminalization, the quantity and quality of responses and the elements of criminal responsibility are determined in the theory of criminal law. This article analyzes the republican perspective, which is a combination of social lifestyle and political theory, in relation to basic concepts such as human being, freedom, law, the state, public good and civic virtue, and then outlines the criminal law resulting from this intellectual system. The attitude of the republican tradition towards the basic concepts affecting different areas of criminal law unconsciously draws the mind towards a criminal law system characterized by minimal intervention and places concepts such as the rule of law, freedom, justice and equality, public good, human dignity and morality at the forefront of the basic concepts that are the basis of valuation. In republican thought, crime is essentially intentional or grossly reckless behavior that limits the realm of personal sovereignty or threatens the public and common interests of citizens, which is optimally manifested as a last resort and in the event of the failure of preventive measures. Punishment, since it limits freedom and dominates the personal sovereignty of citizens, is justified simply because it is a factor in the connection of the criminal with society and restores the lost dominance of the victim. Observance of two principles in the application of punishment is very visible in republican criminal law; one is observing the hierarchy of criminal response against the perpetrator and the other is paying attention to the extent of the criminal's encroachment on the realm of personal sovereignty of the victim and not exceeding this criterion in the establishment and implementation of punishment.





Keywords
Subjects

 
5-2. منابع خارجی  
A)Books
1.    Dagger, Richard (2011)."Republicanism and the Foundations of Criminal Law." In Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, edited by R. Duff and Stuart Green. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.    Lovett, Frank (2018). Non-Domination, The Oxford Handbook of Freedom, Edited by David Schmidtz and Carmen E. Pavel, Oxford University Press.
3.    Braithwaite, John and Philip Pettit, (1990). not just deserts, a Republican Theory of Criminal Justice, oxford, Clarendon press.
4.    Pettit, Philip (1997). Republican theory and Criminal Punishment, Utilitas, Vol. 9 No.1.
5.    Pettit, Philip (1998). Republican: A theory of freedem and Government, Oxford: Oxford university press.
6.    Pettit, Philip (1997). Republican political theory, cambridge university press .
7.    Rawls, John (2005). A Theory of justice, the belknap press of harvard university press Cambridge.
8.    Dagger, Richard (2009). "Republicanism and Crime." In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí, 147-66. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.    Sellers, M (2003). Republican Legal Theory: The History, Constitution and Purposes of Law in a Free State (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
10. Pettit, Philip (2014). Criminalization in Republican Theory, in criminalization: the political morality of the criminal law, editor by Duff, farmer, Renzo, marshal, tadros, oxford press.
11. Moore, Michael (1997). Placing Blame: A Theory of Criminal Law Theories, Oxford University Press.
12. Duff, A.R and Garland, D (1994). introduction: thinking about punishment, oxford university press.
13. Braithwaite, John (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
B) Articles
14. Edwards, James (2018)."Theories of Criminal Law", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall2018Edition),EdwardN.Zalta(ed.),URL=
15. Tur, Richard (2014). Two Theories of criminal law, Vol 56 SMU Law Review, 797-818.
16. Fletcher, George P (2000). The Nature and Function of Criminal Theory, Vol 88. Calif. Law. Rev, 687-704.
17. Braithwaite, John (1997). Republican Theory and Crime Control, to International Institute for the Sociology of Law, Social Dynamics and the Regulatory Order in Modern Societies—New Theoretical Perspectives on the Causes of Crime and Social Control, 87-103.
18. DUFF R.A. (2010). A criminal law for citizens, University of Stirling, UK,http://www.sagepub.co.uk  journalsPermissions.nav Vol. 14(3), 293–309.
19. Lovett, Frank (2006). "Republicanism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta /http/plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/republicanism.
20. Lovett, frank (2019). Republicanism and Democracy Revisited, Frank Lovett, from Part IV - Democratizing the Republic, Republicanizing Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 117-129.
21. Lovett, Frank and Whitfield, Gregory (2016). Republicanism, Perfectionism, and Neutrality, The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 24, Number 1, 120–134.
22. Marshall, S. E. and Duff, R. A (1998). 'Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs', Canadian journal of Law and jurisprudence, Vol 11, Issue 1,7 - 21.
23. Stanton, John (2007). Strict Liability: Stigma and Regret, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, Volume 27, Issue 1, 1 January 2007, 151–173.
24. Murphy, Jeffrie (2006). Retributivism, Moral Education, and the Liberal State. In: Criminal Justice Ethics.; Vol. 4, No 1, 3-11.
25. Hirsch, A (1992). proportionality in the philosophy of punishment, the university of Chicago press vol .16, 55-98.
26. Gruber, Aya (2010). A Distributive Theory of Criminal Law, Vol 52 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.Issue 1, 1-73.
27. Eshleman, Andrew (2014)."Moral Responsibility" Philosophy Faculty Publications and Presentations. Paper 1.http://pilotscholars.up.edu/phl_facpubs/1, University of Portland Pilot Scholars.
28. Braithwaite, John (2017). Criminal jactice that revives republican democracy, Vool 111, No 6, NW.U.L. Rev,1507-1524.
 
)In persion(
A)                 Books
29. Balavi, Mahdi and Mehnaz Bayat (2018). Dolat-e Haq-Bonyad: Tahlil-e Ma'na, Tabyin-e Mabna. 1st ed., Vol. 1, Tehran: Majd.
30. Heywood, Andrew (2015). Moqaddame-ye Nazariye-ye Siasi. Translated by Abdolrahman Alem. 3rd ed., Tehran: Ghoms.
 
B)                 Articles
31. Ebrahimi, Omid, Hassan Pourbafarani, & Mohsen Shokarchi Zadeh. (2020). Preventive Measures against Disruptive Acts in Obtaining Bank Credits in the Criminal Policy of Iran and the European Union. Journal of Comparative Law Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, Autumn, 1–25.
32. Ahadi, Fatemeh (2011). Mafhum va Mabani-ye Jarayem ba Mas'uliyat-e Motlaq. Majalle-ye Feqh va Mabanī-ye Hoquq-e Eslami, Vol. 2, No. 5, Fall, 142–164.
33. Janipour, Mojtaba, et al (2014). Barrasi-ye Mas'uliyat-e Motlaq az Manzar-e Hoquq-e Keyfari va Feqh-e Emamiye ba Ta'kid bar Mas'uliyat-e Pezeshk. Majalle-ye Feqh va Hoquq-e Eslami, Vol. 4, No. 6, Spring–Summer, 23–53.
34. Rostami, Hadi (2015). Jorm-angari va Keyfar-gozari dar Partow-e Osul-e Mahdud-konande-ye Azadi dar Nazariye-ye Liberal. Pazhuheshname-ye Hoquq-e Keyfari, Year 5, No. 1, Spring–Summer, 55–81.
35. Farajiha, Mohammad, Rahim Nobahar, & Jalil Omidi. (2021). Models of Legislative Intervention in the Realm of Marital Rape: A Comparative Study. Journal of Comparative Law Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, Spring, 143–171.
36. Gholami, Hossein (2013). Asl-e Hadaghal Boodan-e Hoquq-e Jaza. Faslname-ye Hoquq-e Keyfari, Year 1, No. 2, 41–65.
37. Mahmoudi Janaki, Firouz; Manteqi, Fa’ezeh (2020). Hoquq-e Keyfari dar Partow-e Nazariye-ye Siasi-ye Dolat-e Mashruteh. Motale'at-e Hoquq-e Keyfari va Jorm-shenasi, Vol. 49, No. 1, Spring–Summer, 163–184.
Nobahar, Rahim (2012). Asl-e Karbord-e Kamine-ye Hoquq-e Keyfari. Amoozéha-ye Hoquq-e Keyfari, Summer, No. 1, 91–114.