Volume 16, Issue 1 (2012)
CLR 2012, 16(1): 79-105 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Daryae R D, Norouzi M. Comparative Research on Interim Injunction in Iranian Industrial Property Law and TIRIPS agreement. CLR 2012; 16 (1) :79-105
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-12183-en.html
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-12183-en.html
1- 1-Ph.D. student, Department of Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2- 2- Ph.D. student, Department of Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2- 2- Ph.D. student, Department of Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (6783 Views)
One of the frequent matters in Iranian industrial property law is the problem of provisional order. Nevertheless, some of the phrases applied in the regulation confuse judges in taking injunctional measures. For example, when the seizure of violating goods is for the purpose of provisional order, or which court has the local competent when the subject matter of the order is situated out of Tehran jurisdiction? This article seeks to answer the questions arisen from vague points of the matter in Iranian law in order to release judges from the confusion and give suggestions for next reformation of the law.
Received: 2012/05/5 | Accepted: 2012/06/11 | Published: 2012/06/20
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |