Volume 27, Issue 3 (2023)
CLR 2023, 27(3): 137-161 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nouranimoghaddam Y, Jafary F, mokhtari M. Jurisdictional or Admissibility Issue of the Breach of the
Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses. CLR 2023; 27 (3) :137-161
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-71146-en.html
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-71146-en.html
1- Assistant Professor in Private Law , Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran , nooreadl@yahoo.com
2- Assistant Professor in Private Law , Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
3- Ph. D. Student in Private Law, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor in Private Law , Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
3- Ph. D. Student in Private Law, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract: (978 Views)
Nowadays, by the increasing expansion of commercial contracts in the international arena, the use of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses have been increased. These clauses have many functions for the parties compared to other judicial and arbitration methods. Identifying this issue is very useful in the practical procedure, assuming that the terms of the dispute resolution are binding, the arbitrator starts the arbitration regardless of the observance of these terms by the parties, the arbitration award is invalid due to the lack of competence of the arbitrator, or the violation of the terms is simply a matter of admissibility. A group is of the opinion that non-compliance with the condition of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses directly affects the jurisdiction, and the arbitrator has exceeded the limits of his jurisdiction, subsequently the decision issued according to the law is null, and it has no legal effect. In contrast, some believe that this issue is related to the admissibility, which is a gentler approach and in line with respecting the sovereignty of the volition governance principle to resolve the dispute through arbitration and non-intervention of the court. Basically, their basis for supporting this theory is that the claim is merely defective in form, and the arbitration agreement between the parties is valid. Regarding the types of legal reactions to non-compliance with the conditions of dispute resolution, suspending the arbitration process at the same time as granting a deadline to comply with the pre-arbitration conditions is preferable to other solutions.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Comparative Law
Received: 2023/08/19 | Accepted: 2023/11/28 | Published: 2023/12/20
Received: 2023/08/19 | Accepted: 2023/11/28 | Published: 2023/12/20
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |