کنشگری سازمان های بین المللی در توسعه حقوق بین الملل عرفی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار، حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
موضوع چگونگی کنش‌گری سازمان‌های بین‌المللی به‌عنوان یکی از تابعان فعال حقوق بین­الملل که هم واضع و هم موضوع قواعد حقوق بین­الملل قلم‌داد می­شوند- در توسعه حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی از جمله موضوعات نو در عرصه­ی حقوق بین­الملل معاصر است؛ از این رو، کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل در پیش‌نویس مواد خود راجع به شناسایی­ حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، این موضوع را در دستور کار خود قرار داده است. همان‌طور که در ماده 15 اساس‌نامه‌ی کمیسیون‌ تصریح شده، مراد از «توسعه»، شکل‌دهی یا تقنین عرف است و نه تدوین آن. بدین ترتیب نویسنده در این پژوهش با به‌کارگیری اصطلاح توسعه که واجد خصیصه‌ی انشایی یا ایجادی است، به دنبال تبیین نقش تقنینی سازمان‌های بین‌المللی در ایجاد حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی جدید است. مسئله­ی اصلی تحقیق حاضر، ابهامات موجود در رویکرد اتخاذشده توسط کمیسیون حقوق بین­الملل است؛ در این خصوص ماده 4(2) پیش­نویس مواد مقرر داشته است: «سازمان‌های بین‌المللی در حوزه قواعدی که موضوع آن‌ها ۱) در دامنه‌ی اختیارات آن سازمان است؛ یا ۲) به‌طور خاص به آن سازمان محول شده باشد (مانند اتحادیه اروپا)؛ همین‌طور زمانی‌که انجام اختیارات از جانب آن‌ها، اعمال اختیارات خود دولت‌های عضو شناخته شود، می­توانند در شکل‌گیری عرف مشارکت ­کنند.» اگرچه کمیسیون، کلیت این موضوع را مورد تصریح قرار داده اما در خصوص جزئیات نحوه‌ی کنش‌گری سازمان­ها مقرره­ای وضع نکرده است. بنابراین در مقاله حاضر با استفاده از روش توصیفی- تحلیلی سعی شده است با به‌کارگیری منابع قابل اعمال، نحوه‌ی کنش‌گری سازمان­های بین­المللی در توسعه عرفی بین­المللی مورد بررسی قرار گیرد.

موضوعات


1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).







1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).







1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).







1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).







1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).







1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).







1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).







1. بیگ زاده، ابراهیم(1389). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مجد.
2. زرنشان، شهرام(1392). شکل‌گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، کتابخانه گنج دانش.
3. زمانی، سید قاسم (1396). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی (جلد اول)، چاپ دوم، تهران، موسسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
4. ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا(1394). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ پنجاهم، تهران، نشر گنج دانش.
ب)مقالات
موسوی، سید فضل الله(1374). «آیا حقوق بین‌الملل عام، تنها حقوق عرفی است؟»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، شماره 18 و 19، صص،352-341.
2) منابع لاتین
a) Books
1. Cassese, Antonio (1986). International Law in a Divided World, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2. Droubi, Sufyan, & Jean d'Aspremont (Eds.) (2020). International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press.
3. Heliskoski, Joni (2013). "EU Declarations of Competence and International Responsibility." The International Responsibility of the European :union:, European and International Perspectives. Ed. Malcolm Evans and Panos Koutrakos, London, Hart Publishing.
4. Klabbers, Jan (2020), International Law, 3rd Ed, Cambridge University Press.
5. Lepard, Brian D (2010), customary international law : a new theory with practical applications, Cambridge University Press.
6. Shaw, Malcom. N (2008), International law, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Zimmermann, Andreas, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (2006). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
b) Articles
1. Blokker, Niels (2017), "International Organizations and Customary International Law, Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?" , International Organizations Law Reiview14, 1-12.
2. Daugridas, Kristina (2020), "International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law", Ejil, VOL. 31, NO.1, pp. 201-233.
3. Odermatt, Jed (2014), "The Court of Justice of the European :union:: International or Domestic Court?", 3 CJICL.
4. Odermatt, Jed (2017), "The Development of Customary International Law dy International Organizations", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 491-511.
5. Vanhamme, Jan (2008), "Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European :union:’s Contribution", 29 NYIL.
C) Cases
1. ICJ, Advisory Opinion Concerning Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 28 May 1951.
2. ICJ, Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), 20 November 1950.
3. ICJ, Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
4. ICJ, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Judgment on the merits, ICGJ 421 (ICJ 2009), 13th July 2009.
5. ICJ, Fisheries case, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1951, 18 December 1951.
6. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974.
7. ICJ, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012.
8. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 8 July 1996.
9. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, ICJ Reports, 1986.
10. ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 20 February 1969.
11. ICJ, Nottebohm case (2nd phase), ICJ Rep. 1955.
12. ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v India, Merits, Judgment, [1960] ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 174 (ICJ 1960), 12th April 1960.
13. P.C.I.J, S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 7 Sept 1927.
d) Documents
1. American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute Publishers 1987) Section102 (Sources of International Law) Reporters’ Notes 2.
2. ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, 15.
3. ILC, Comments and Observations Received from Governments,70th session, 2018, P.19-20.
4. ILC, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Sixty-seventh session, Geneva, (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015), Un Doc A/CN.4/682, (‘Third Report’), para 72.
5. International Law Association, ILA Final Report of the Committee, Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law. London Conference, 2000.
6. Michael Wood (Special Rapporteur), Fifth Rep. on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/717 t paras. 36-37.
7. UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, Art.21 (2);
8. UN Security Council, Security Council resolution 794 (1992) [Somalia], 3 December 1992, S/RES/794, 1992.
9. United Nations, 23 May 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331.
10. United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, art. 24, para. 1.
11. United Nations, Report of the Committee on the Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification on the Methods for Encouraging the Progressive Development of International Law and its Eventual Codification’ (18 July 1947) UN Doc A/331, para 10.
12. United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946, Art.38 (d).